Cobalt-NTA

UNMAPPED_0154 chemically defined UNMAPPED

Ontology mapping

Primary identifier
UNMAPPED_0154
Notes
Imported from CultureBotHT (compounds_to_cas.csv (no CAS-RN)). No CAS-RN or CHEBI mapping available; curator review needed. Reviewed on 2026-05-11 as a metal-NTA complex; not identity-mapped to generic NTA or cobalt.

Synonyms (1)

SynonymTypeSourceOccurrences
Cobalt-NTA RAW_TEXT culturebotht

Occurrence statistics

Total occurrences
0
Distinct media
0

Curation history

TimestampCuratorActionNew statusChanges
2026-04-29T06:51:33.117170+00:00 audit_add_remaining_culturebotht CREATED_AS_UNMAPPED UNMAPPED Imported from CultureBotHT (compounds_to_cas.csv (no CAS-RN)). No CAS-RN or CHEBI mapping available; curator review needed.
2026-05-11T07:56:05Z mediaingredientmech-agentic-curation LLM REVIEWED_METAL_NTA_COMPLEX UNMAPPED Classified as a single metal-NTA complex and left unmapped because no exact local ontology term for cobalt-NTA was verified; generic NTA or cobalt mappings would not preserve complex identity.
2026-08-06T00:00:00+00:00 edison_literature_identity LLM ANNOTATED Edison LITERATURE (PaperQA3) identity research; report at research/ingredients/Cobalt-NTA-edison-literature.md (local artifact — research/ is gitignored, so the findings are quoted here rather than linked). Report verdict: **Recommended interpretation:** “Cobalt‑NTA” is best treated as an **underspecified cobalt–nitrilotriacetate coordination complex label**, not as a uniquely defined single bottle chemical. The literature explicitly describes cobalt–nitrilotriacetate as a cobalt **amino‑polycarboxylate complex** and uses it as a soluble cobalt source. However, the retrieved evidence does not uniquely fix cobalt oxi No ontology CURIE was proposed. Recorded as provenance only — no grounding applied from this run. Edison's recommendations are deliberately conservative, and a plausible identifier promoted by a mechanism that never decided anything is what #203 and #263 exist to undo. Any CURIE above is a curator's to accept or reject.