| 2026-08-06T00:00:00+00:00 |
edison_literature_identity
LLM
|
ANNOTATED |
|
Edison LITERATURE (PaperQA3) identity research; report at research/ingredients/Gjerstad_humics-edison-literature.md (local artifact — research/ is gitignored, so the findings are quoted here rather than linked). Report verdict: **Recommendation: retain `UNMAPPED` and `UNDEFINED_MIXTURE`.** The literature search found no evidence that “Gjerstad humics” is a single chemical, salt, hydrate, buffer, or fixed commercial formulation. The strongest bibliographic lead is the Norwegian natural-organic-matter (NOM) literature, especially the NOM-typing project and later algal-exposure studies. This supports treating the label prov No ontology CURIE was proposed. Recorded as provenance only — no grounding applied from this run. Edison's recommendations are deliberately conservative, and a plausible identifier promoted by a mechanism that never decided anything is what #203 and #263 exist to undo. Any CURIE above is a curator's to accept or reject. |