| 2026-08-04T02:54:09.684805+00:00 |
audit_import_ingredients[microbedecoder]
|
CREATED_AS_UNMAPPED |
UNMAPPED
|
Imported from microbedecoder (source_id=kgmicrobe.trait:glycyl_l_bromosuccinic_glutamic_acid); no CAS-RN or CHEBI/NCIT match. Curator review needed. |
| 2026-08-06T00:00:00+00:00 |
issue_213_residual_triage
LLM
|
FLAGGED_NEEDS_EXPERT |
NEEDS_EXPERT
|
Parse artefact: reads as two run-together dipeptide/reagent names rather than one compound. Searched CHEBI, NCIT, FOODON, ENVO, MeSH, BTO and UBERON by label and synonym with normalisation, plus exact queries across all of live OLS4. |
| 2026-08-06T00:00:00+00:00 |
edison_literature_identity
LLM
|
ANNOTATED |
|
Edison LITERATURE (PaperQA3) identity research; report at research/ingredients/Glycyl-L-bromosuccinic_Glutamic_Acid-edison-literature.md (local artifact — research/ is gitignored, so the findings are quoted here rather than linked). Report verdict: **Recommended interpretation:** this raw string is **not supported as the name of a single chemical, salt, hydrate, mixture, buffer, extract, or commercial formulation**. It is most plausibly a malformed concatenation or token-merging artifact derived from a Biolog substrate list. No ontology CURIE was proposed. Recorded as provenance only — no grounding applied from this run. Edison's recommendations are deliberately conservative, and a plausible identifier promoted by a mechanism that never decided anything is what #203 and #263 exist to undo. Any CURIE above is a curator's to accept or reject. |
| 2026-08-15T00:00:00+00:00 |
retire_assay_labels
|
RETIRED_NOT_AN_INGREDIENT |
REJECTED
|
Retired as an ingredient record (#213/#308): a splice of TWO Biolog panel substrates run together by the #308 ingest: `glycyl-L-glutamic acid` and `bromosuccinic acid`. Both are already records — `Gly-Glu` (CHEBI:73801) and `Bromosuccinate` (CHEBI:73706) — so there is nothing left to ground once the splice is recognised. Not mapped, because every substrate CURIE it could be grounded to is already the primary key of a live record — in MIM the identifier IS the ontology CURIE, so a mapping here would mint a duplicate rather than add coverage. No synonym is folded onto those records either: this label names a reaction or a splice, not the substance, and asserting the synonymy would make label_index resolve it to something it does not denote. |