| 2026-04-29T06:51:33.117170+00:00 |
audit_add_remaining_culturebotht
|
CREATED_AS_UNMAPPED |
UNMAPPED
|
Imported from CultureBotHT (compounds_to_cas.csv (no CAS-RN)). No CAS-RN or CHEBI mapping available; curator review needed. |
| 2026-05-11T07:56:05Z |
mediaingredientmech-agentic-curation
LLM
|
REVIEWED_METAL_NTA_COMPLEX |
UNMAPPED
|
Classified as a single metal-NTA complex and left unmapped because no exact local ontology term for nickel-NTA was verified; generic NTA or nickel mappings would not preserve complex identity. |
| 2026-08-06T00:00:00+00:00 |
edison_literature_identity
LLM
|
ANNOTATED |
|
Edison LITERATURE (PaperQA3) identity research; report at research/ingredients/Nickel-NTA-edison-literature.md (local artifact — research/ is gitignored, so the findings are quoted here rather than linked). Report verdict: ## Executive recommendation — **Retain `UNMAPPED`.** The bare label **Nickel-NTA / Ni-NTA** is not sufficiently specific for identity mapping. In the literature it denotes both (i) a soluble nickel(II)–nitrilotriacetate coordination complex and (ii) NTA immobilized on agarose, beads, nanoparticles, or other surfaces and charged with Ni²⁺. The latter is a support-dependent affinity material rather No ontology CURIE was proposed. Recorded as provenance only — no grounding applied from this run. Edison's recommendations are deliberately conservative, and a plausible identifier promoted by a mechanism that never decided anything is what #203 and #263 exist to undo. Any CURIE above is a curator's to accept or reject. |