AIMech AI

Divide-and-conquer beam-stack search

Algorithms AIMech:DivideConquerBeamStackSearch DRAFT
Aliases: DCBSS
A beam-stack search implementation that retains a small set of search layers and relay information, regenerates missing layers for backtracking, and reconstructs a solution through recursive subproblems.
Identity Notes & Concept Scope DCBSS is the divide-and-conquer implementation of beam-stack search described by Zhou and Hansen. Unlike divide-and-conquer beam search without backtracking, it retains beam-stack range information that permits previously discarded layers to be regenerated and searched further. No normalized identity match was found across the 442 AIO and 130 prior native records; ignored-inclusive text hits in the main checkout were prior discovery leads, source citations and search-order contrasts, plus incidental lightbulb and wet-bulb dependency substrings, not existing concept records.

Claims & Grounded Evidence

2 Claims
Mechanism #search-procedure
Retain the current, previous, successor and relay layers, with relay references used to divide path reconstruction into smaller searches. If chronological backtracking reaches a layer no longer stored, replay from the start using the saved beam-stack ranges to rebuild it. For the general non-unit-cost case in the paper, retain the best goal information and delay path reconstruction until backtracking begins.
Scope #disk-variant-boundary
A separately described external-memory option stores old layers on disk instead of regenerating them. Restoring a layer also requires the previous layer for duplicate detection and repairing relay references; disk use is an optional implementation extension, not part of every DCBSS execution.

⚠️ Curated Limitations & Negative Results

Artificial Intelligence Ontology (AIO) Grounding

Explicit AIO Snapshot Assessment: No Match

Rationale: No suitable AIO counterpart for this graph/state-space search procedure was identified in the inspected snapshot. Using graphs, evaluation functions or a search subroutine in an AI system does not equate the algorithm with a learned model, a learning task or a mathematical function.

Search Scope: All 442 pinned AIO labels and scoped synonyms and 130 preceding native identities were compared. Both updated checkouts were searched including hidden and ignored files. Exact CLASS nodes and edges for GraphLanguageModel, ReasoningLLM, NeuroSymbolicLLM, MachineLearningTask, MathematicalFunction and ReinforcementLearning were inspected, alongside semantic search for search, planning, heuristic, path, traversal, symbolic, reasoning and graph terminology.
Examined AIO Candidate Rejection Reason
AIO:GraphLanguageModel A language model operating on structured graph representations is not a graph traversal or shortest-path algorithm.
AIO:ReasoningLLM Language-task deductive inference does not denote general state-space search.
AIO:NeuroSymbolicLLM A language-model architecture combining neural and symbolic components is not the search procedure itself.
AIO:MachineLearningTask Building methods that learn from data is not the identity of an algorithm traversing a specified graph.
AIO:MathematicalFunction The search procedure is distinct from the mathematical functions it may evaluate.
AIO:ReinforcementLearning A learning task balancing exploration and exploitation is distinct from deterministic graph/state-space traversal.

Evidence Sources & Primary Literature

2 Sources
Source ID Publication / Document Type / Access Reference & Checksum
method-source
Rong Zhou, Eric A. Hansen
primary paper
full_text
sha256:eb2ac12fea9d…
external-memory-boundary
Rong Zhou, Eric A. Hansen
primary paper
full_text
sha256:eb2ac12fea9d…

Curation Provenance

Curator: Codex
Method: ai_assisted
Model: GPT-6
Created: 2026-10-11T06:01:43Z
Updated: 2026-10-11T06:01:43Z
Source File: data/curated/DivideConquerBeamStackSearch.yaml