Sources and schema
Complete family index, metadata and provenance (JSON)
Frozen inputs
- cross_mech: data/cross_mech/cross-mech-duf-examples-2026-10-10.json
- members: data/worklists/pfam-uniprot-uniref90-2026-10-07.json
- protein_examples: data/protein_examples/duf-protein-examples-2026-10-13.json
- schema: src/dufmech/schema/dufmech.yaml
- shared_schema: src/dufmech/schema/mech_shared.yaml
- worklist: data/worklists/interpro-pfam-duf-2026-10-10.json
Protein domain match dataset
pfam-uniprot-uniref90-2026-10-07: 2 frozen member rows across 1 families. This subset is not a complete family membership census.
Generated: 2026-10-07T07:39:51.164664Z. Worklist seed: interpro-pfam-duf-2026-10-05.
SHA-256: 8915922e639601527d923bcba45420386add54180525fdb242f77e961437dcda.
Download frozen member rows (JSON) | Download checksum manifest (JSON)
Source: InterPro Pfam members, UniProtKB and UniRef. Pfam membership and match coordinates: InterPro, CC0. Protein metadata and UniRef mappings: the UniProt Consortium, CC BY 4.0. The figures render the recorded coordinates without inferring structure or function.
Protein sequence example dataset
duf-protein-examples-2026-10-13: 8,947 proteins; 3,106 families with sequences out of 8,296 audited families.
Frozen examples (JSON) | Manifest
UniProt Consortium, CC BY 4.0. Sequence examples are family-membership references, not functional claims.
Site build f6a3d5197ea761bc. Source links are pinned to the supplied or verified source commits. Input snapshot identifiers are listed in the footer. No live scientific data is fetched by these pages.
Retained reviews
- 2026-10-07T07:24:23.895662Z: NEEDS_FOLLOWUP by Codex (GPT-6), scoped implementation audit
Scope: Review/history implementation, retained-report semantics, and repository skill contracts.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-07T07:24:23.895662Z: SEED_ONLY by Codex (GPT-6), scoped implementation audit
Scope: Two explicitly selected frozen rows: identity, evidence categories, and lump/split triage.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-07T07:24:23.895662Z: SEED_ONLY by Codex (GPT-6), scoped implementation audit
Scope: Frozen-row identity, source integrity, and evidence-completeness triage only.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-07T08:06:30Z: SEED_ONLY by Codex (GPT-5 coding agent), independent scoped reviewer
Scope: Offline identity, frozen-source provenance and generated-record integrity of candidate working-tree PF04149; no biological functional characterization or live-source verification.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-07T12:29:24Z: SEED_ONLY by Codex (GPT-5 coding agent; scoped implementation reviewer)
Scope: Offline PF04149 identity, frozen-input provenance, evidence inventory, and native schema/history-index integration audit; no live-source verification, functional literature review, or scientific endorsement.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-08T07:14:32Z: PASS by Codex
Scope: Implementation audit of the local classification-release-guards patch for DUFMech issues #165 and #173: Pfam unknown-name parsing, historical naming versus current unknown-function reasons, policy-versioned reclassification and verified input compatibility. No scientific family curation, source adoption or corpus migration.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-08T07:54:22Z: PASS by Codex
Scope: Adversarial implementation review of local fixes for DUFMech #156 and #176: parent-row verification in scoring/report loaders and preservation of former-name provenance across cross-Mech derivations. No scientific family review, new source ingestion, or corpus adoption.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-08T16:05:21Z: PASS by Codex (GPT-5)
Scope: Adversarial review of PR #180's classification, parent-row verification and chained alias-provenance changes, including reproduction and repair of #181 and #182. Tooling review only.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-09T07:10:02Z: PASS by Codex
Scope: Review the seven changed source-retention, workflow, test and documentation files, limited to the PR 185 diff. Assess canonical repository identity, actual blob correspondence, fail-closed behavior, isolation from local Git configuration, squash/tag lifecycle, offline/online separation, and Pages review-base availability. No functional assertions, taxonomy, source licensing or whole-repository scientific completeness are assessed.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-09T07:19:06Z: PASS by Codex
Scope: Inspect four maintained files changed in d719a3a74: canonical structured-review download allowlisting, source-directory protection in explicit and inferred native builds, and end-to-end rendering/security regression coverage. No new functional evidence or scientific corpus curation.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-09T07:36:21Z: PASS by Codex
Scope: Compare only structured-review ID rules and their writer integration across the four captured files. The vendored schema and helper are read-only contract evidence, not a new audit of all shared behavior. Assess the two changed files and the exact contract sections they implement.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-10T20:59:44Z: NEEDS_FOLLOWUP by Codex
Scope: Release-input audit of the selected frozen snapshots, PF18141 seed projection, corpus manifest, exports, ID labels, source governance and regression tests. Deterministic comparisons cover every inherited worklist row and projection, not scientific review of every family.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-13T02:10:59Z: FAIL by Codex
Scope: Historical review of the original four committed files at 9053fcf72. The baseline was inspected before fixes and reproduced with temporary probes. Later negative tests were run against that original module loaded from git, not against a claim that those tests existed in the baseline.. Scientific review: False.
- 2026-10-13T02:12:37Z: NEEDS_FOLLOWUP by Codex
Scope: Read the four selected protein acquisition, validation, rendering and regression files. Assess immutable input handling, sequence origin semantics, all-family coverage and presentation of membership versus functional claims.. Scientific review: False.
Record schema
LinkML family schema documentation
Status and evidence
- Seed status
- A name-based classification of frozen InterPro/Pfam metadata. UNKNOWN CANDIDATE means the metadata explicitly says the function is unknown. KNOWN HISTORICAL DUF means a DUF name matched without that wording; this heuristic is not proof of a known function and does not establish experimental characterization. EX DUF means Pfam renamed the family away from a DUF/UPF name, as recorded in Pfam's previous identifiers; a rename usually follows published work on some members but is naming history, not proof of function for every member. Some EX DUF families' current names or descriptions still say the function is unknown; their classification basis lists this, and scoring does not treat them as characterized. FALSE POSITIVE TEXT HIT means the naming rules did not match.
- Characterization
- A separate evidence-scoring result. UNSCORED means no score has been calculated; it is not evidence that the family lacks a known function. Missing scores are not negative evidence. PARTIALLY CHARACTERIZED has partial support; KNOWN HISTORICAL DUF can inherit the seed label or reflect a known-function signal. Neither label implies experimental validation.
- Evidence counts
- Source-specific signals, not unique proteins, publications, or confidence scores. Known counts Rhea reactions and experimentally supported GO molecular-function annotations. Partial counts functional/domain assignments. Context counts structural, environmental, orthology, interaction and neighborhood signals; context alone does not assign function. Repeated annotations may not be independent.
- Curation status
- Reported separately from seed classification and characterization. SNAPSHOT ONLY means no curated metadata was supplied for this build. SEEDED denotes a source-derived record, not an expert-reviewed functional claim.
- Missing counts
- Not available means the source did not supply that counter. A zero is a reported count. Not scored means evidence counts are unavailable.