area designated as a nature reserve
A protected area of importance for wildlife, flora, fauna or features of geological or other special interest, which is reserved and managed for conservation and to provide special opportunities for study or research. Nature reserves may be designated by government institutions in some countries, such as the United Kingdom, or by private landowners, such as charities and research institutions, regardless of nationality.
Source attestations
| Source | Label / path | Assertions | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOLD | Environmental > Terrestrial > Soil > Nature reserve | — | |
| PREGO | area designated as a nature reserve | 3 | TAXON |
Broader habitats
- area of protected biodiversity
ENVO:00000358 - soil
ENVO:00001998
Associated taxa
| Taxon | Source | Rank | Pool | Corroborated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Granulicella tundricola MP5ACTX9 NCBITaxon:1198114 |
PREGO | 1 | 3 | |
Paracoccus saliphilus NCBITaxon:405559 |
PREGO | 2 | 3 | |
Mucilaginibacter frigoritolerans NCBITaxon:652788 |
PREGO | 3 | 3 |
Also called
- Nature reserve
- natural preserve
- natural preserve
- natural preserves
- natural reserve
- natural reserve
- natural reserves
- nature preserve
- nature preserve
- nature preserves
- nature reserve
- nature reserve
- nature reserves
- protected reserves
- protected reserveses
Curation
-
REVIEW
Reviewed and endorsed the seeder's own resolution. Multi-source review pass: this record is attested by more than one independent vocabulary, and this source's label or path was read against the record's ontology term to check the merge is right. It agrees. Source concepts in the same pass whose labels did not agree were re-decided rather than endorsed; see the pass's other decisions of the same date. (source concept habitatmech:GOLD.576e16fca0)
-
REVIEW
Reviewed and endorsed the seeder's own resolution. Multi-source review pass: this record is attested by more than one independent vocabulary, and this source's label or path was read against the record's ontology term to check the merge is right. It agrees. Source concepts in the same pass whose labels did not agree were re-decided rather than endorsed; see the pass's other decisions of the same date. (source concept habitatmech:PREGO.e642a3c330)