HabitatMech

Microbial habitats, harmonized

The same habitat has three different names depending on who is describing it. HabitatMech resolves them onto one ontology-grounded record and keeps every source's own account of it.

The same habitat, named three ways
SourceHow it names marine sediment
JGI GOLDEnvironmental > Aquatic > Marine > Sediment
BacDiveMarine-sediment
PREGOENVO:00002113

What HabitatMech adds

HabitatMech is not a re-labelling of ENVO. Most of what it holds, ENVO has no term for — and a concept that merely hangs under an ENVO term counts as new, because the identifier is minted precisely when the matched term is broader than the concept.

Coverage against the ontologies HabitatMech grounds to
RecordsAssertionsStatus
530373995ENVO names this concept directly
62869819another vendored OBO ontology names it; ENVO does not
729132799no term, but narrower than an ENVO term it hangs under
69241904no term, but narrower than a non-ENVO term
62735284no ontology term names it or anything above it

Browse by category

Records per category
CategoryRecordsShare
HOST_ASSOCIATED 1649
ENGINEERED 487
AQUATIC 468
TERRESTRIAL 353
OTHER 178
FOOD 61
AIR 7
CLINICAL 3

What the grounding status means

Every record says how well its identifier fits the source concept, separately from the recorded curation workflow status. A record can be reviewed and still honestly ungrounded — that combination is a well-formed request for a new ontology term, and there are 127 of them.

Grounding status
StatusRecordsMeaning
EXACT 1059The identifier is an exact match for the source concept.
NARROW 985The identifier is narrower than the source concept.
UNGROUNDED 954No defensible ontology term; a minted identifier and a term-request candidate.
NOT_APPLICABLE 102Not a habitat at all — a disease, quality, process or procedure.
CLOSE 93Close, but not exact and not cleanly broader or narrower.
BROAD 13The identifier is broader — the best available term, losing specificity.

This corpus is machine-generated. 2516 of 3206 records have the SEEDED workflow status. The harmonization rules are documented and tested, but a lexical match between a source label and an ontology label is a plausible grounding, not a verified one.

REVIEWED records carry a recorded workflow decision, including agent-assisted curation. These counts do not establish human review. Consult the attributed curation events on each record for its provenance.