Each upstream vocabulary's own account of this habitat. Assertion
counts are per-source units and are not comparable across sources —
GOLD counts organisms, BacDive strains, PREGO taxa.
What each upstream vocabulary says about this habitat
Taxa reported from this habitat, which is weaker than being
characteristic of it. rank is out of pool: a high rank in a
pool of thousands of near-tied scores is a weak claim. Entries corroborated by a
second, independent source are listed first.
What a curator decided about this record, and why. A record built
from several source concepts can carry one decision per concept.
GROUND2026-08-14 · claude-opus-5
Grounded to ENVO:00000029 'watercourse' (CLOSE). Cohort review: NCIT:C43963 'Creek' drops the river half. ENVO:00000029 'watercourse' is the genus of both river and creek, so it covers the source instead of picking one branch of it. Merges with the existing GOLD watercourse record, which is the harmonization working. (source concept habitatmech:BACDIVE.1106e09fbe)
REVIEW2026-08-16 · claude-opus-5
Reviewed and endorsed the seeder's own resolution. Risky-grounding review (#12), co-attestor pass: this source concept feeds a record whose grounding was flagged and reviewed, and the record could not reach REVIEWED until every source feeding it was decided. This one is a self-grounding: the source vocabulary names the concept with the ontology term's own label, so there is nothing to adjudicate between the two — checked that the term is the one the label denotes, and that the record it merges into is the same concept rather than a homonym. (source concept habitatmech:PREGO.9ea6257ae4)
Provenance
Generated by scripts/seed_from_sources.py from the committed
inventories in data/raw/.
View the record.